HomeAnswerNotificationsCustomize Feeds
Do you think that just like the influencers at SH, the moderators should also have an evaluation system that allows extracting data from how well they do their work?

I think it would be excellent to encourage them to do a faster and more efficient job, just like influencers do. No doubt the implementation of a scoring system would make the platform grow to a level of experience as the moderators would be a little more committed.

It would also reduce the complaint among SH users because their hunt would be moderators in more detail and always trying not to make a mistake.

It also seems to me an insentive strategy for those who aspire to be moderators to keep doing quality work on their hunt and curations.


Without a doubt, it would be an excellent idea to implement an evaluation system similar to that of the influencer that allows those who do an excellent job, and give a very good feeback to users stay longer in their job. While those who do not moderate a lot of hunt or tend to approve/delist hunt erroneously make way for someone who may have more time or be more qualified.

I'm pro change, so I think it's excellent to make power rotations, i.e. allow those who are more qualified to also demonstrate that they can cope with the weight of being a moderator.