I will definitely not contradict you, because I believe you have reasons for believing and trusting monarchy as your best form/system of government, i also believe systems of government like democracy, socialism, communism all have weaknesses as well as they have their advantages so even if people believe that democracy is the best form of government it's also has weaknesses of which can be used to exploit it.
The truth is that monarchy makes it possible to have a united nation and it is very difficult to exploit a leader in a monarchy system of government in fact there is always a continuous level of development and progress because a consistent ruler is always there to make sure that there is consistency in progress that is when someone have a chance to rule for a long period of time it will be easier to build a very strong nation however as much as there are advantages to monarchy you must also know that monarchy makes it possible for your ruler and his entire generation to become dictators and when an entire hereditary lineage in a monarchial system of government it's totally dictator then that mention may cease to exist in the long-run.
So every system of government has strengths and weaknesses and so does monarchy however I believe you have reasons for actually trusting monarchy as the best and there's no need to contradict that the only thing is that you found more reason to prefer monarchy to the rest and I believe that should be respected
Why would I contradict you? Here's two very good reason why I contradict you!
1. The monarch is said to be representing the people but in fact he/she's not, because people have no saying in who the monarch is. That's decided by the royal family and that's it! Like it or not, that's how it is! How many of them were incompetent, sometimes mentally ill.
2. History has proven that many of these monarchs had done a pretty awful job as rulers, not to mention the way they became rulers. Many of them had one goal, one goal only, that was their well being, nothing more. They didn't care about people. Many of them inherited the throne as kids, at a young age that they were not able to rule. In these cases someone else got the power and we all know how those people were chosen.
I think the better question is, why do you think monarchy is the best form of government?
Well, monarchy deals with a man or woman at the helm of affairs. Most times, the man or woman is there simply because they were born into a royal family and they can remain in power for life.
A democracy deals more with popular selection (at least in theory). An elected leader's time in office is limited and he can be removed.
There are good monarchs, granted. But history shows that there are often more bad monarchs than good monarchs.
If we have a bad elected leader, we can vote him out. However, we're stuck with a bad monarch until he dies or some event makes him to leave office.
For more responsibility, I'll advise a democratic system
Does the king disperse free cocaine and hookers...? 🤔
If so, undoubtedly NOT. 👑
The monarchy system is outdated. Good for tourists but not good for leading a country. A family controlling and leading a country for life is not correct. They were born into that position and not elected by the vote.
By voting your leaders into power you have a chance of changing the system. You can have good and bad monarchs and history has shown us regularly how bad and power hungry some were.
If Monarchy is the best form of democracy for you, then that's okay! It's your opinion, and I will not contradict you. Besides, that issue is pretty subjective when everyone can have their own opinions.
Contradict you? I am not contradicting you because it is your opinion. I won't spark this debate because you're already at it. However, I was kinda surprised with the purpose of this question. Since you are already closed with your opinion, then why ask people if they'll contradict you? Or maybe I misunderstood you? People can easily misunderstood question because they can sound in different tones.