Yes. The blockchain is not the only type of distributed ledger in existence.
Iota and Byteball, for example, are based on a data structure called directed acyclic graph (DAG). That term simply means a structure that can be described as nodes and directed arcs between them. The structure is acyclic which means that once you leave a node, you cannot go back using another route. Each node represents a transaction. The difference between a DAG-based distributed ledger and a blockchain is that a blockchain is always linear. In IOTA, the network is called a Tangle. In an IOTA tangle, each node transaction is approved by two previous transactions. How that is done is explained in detail in the article that I link below. The essential thing is that transaction validation is quite a bit more distributed than in the blockchain and the system is designed to be more scalable.
The security of IOTA has been criticized heavily. It uses a centralized validator called the Coordinator that is supposedly a temporary solution.
Blockchain and cryptocurrency are intertwined. Blockchain technology gave an individual the freedom to create his/her own currency to raise funds for his/her projects and enable the contributors or investors to profit from contributing on such project in a decentralized manner. I don't think anyone would have the liberty to create a currency that would be acceptable in our wold outside blockchain technology.
So all crypto are linked to blockchain because it's only true blockchain technology that an individual is given the power to create his/her currency for whatever project that he/she is initiating without any interference from government or the centralized financial institutions of the world
At this moment governments and colossal associations are avoiding cryptographic types of cash no matter what. From one viewpoint, allowing Bitcoin as an additional money could obliterate neighborhood cash regard. On interchange, governments need to keep up their controlling framework over printing new money.
That is for what reason there's a noteworthy opening between the cryptocommunity and certified blockchain allocation. Expressions of remorse, anyway this change is going on continuously and is unfortunately connected with deception.
Look at what IBM does: making blockchain PoCs and pilots with no advanced money. Together with various associations (incl. Apla) we are growing blockchain choice rates to help with business allow issuance, automated ID on blockchain, digitazing land vault and stock system. Tokens could be a bit of these cases, yet with no additional exchanges like Binance or Huobi.
Meanwhile the Legality of bitcoin document doesn't suggest that you could buy bitcoin at your adjacent bank. It's formed "genuinely, it's authentic" in my neighborhood Ukraine, anyway I can't use it in favorable store round the corner.
What could happen if blockchain or DLT would be gotten without advanced types of cash?
1. The dream of Bitcoin's founder(s) will be decimated.
2. Adventures and governments will fabricate more dependable IT-structures.
3. Blockchain will be the covered tech like Big Data, so nationals or purchasers wouldn't comprehend that it is evolving anything.
4. Traditions will transform into a gadget of the IT swarm, expelled from most of people.
If we perceive PR populism and about investigate the most unique blockchain government movement like Smart Dubai, you will find that there's the wrong spot for cryptos. Request on the Smartdubai.ae page: no cryptos in their blockchain system. Meanwhile Dubai hopes to wind up a blockchain government by 2021. It suggests that they will discard paper and advance toward getting to be digitalized government. Here blockchain is used as a wellspring of media thought, inhabitant prosperity and bleeding edge advancement.
Propelled change chairman @ Apla. Tech startup counselor. www.linkedin.com/in/syusko
Is there a probability for blockchain without Cryptocurrencies?
At the present time governments and huge associations are avoiding computerized types of cash no matter what. From one viewpoint, allowing Bitcoin as an additional cash could devastate neighborhood money regard. On interchange, governments need to keep up their limiting foundation over printing new money.
That is for what reason there's a noteworthy opening between the cryptocommunity and certified blockchain assignment. Expressions of remorse, yet this agitation is going on bit by bit and is grievously connected with coercion.
Look at what IBM does: making blockchain PoCs and pilots with no cryptographic cash. Together with various associations (incl. Apla) we are growing blockchain assignment rates to help with business allow issuance, modernized ID on blockchain, digitazing land vault and store arrange. Tokens could be a bit of these cases, anyway with no additional exchanges like Binance or Huobi.
Meanwhile the Legality of bitcoin indexdoesn't infer that you could buy bitcoin at your neighborhood bank. It's created "in reality, it's legitimate" in my neighborhood Ukraine, anyway I can't use it in invaluable store round the corner.
What could happen if blockchain or DLT would be gotten without advanced monetary forms?
1. The dream of Bitcoin's founder(s) will be pulverized.
2. Endeavors and governments will collect more trustworthy IT-systems.
3. Blockchain will be the covered tech like Big Data, so nationals or purchasers wouldn't comprehend that it is transforming anything.
4. Traditions will transform into a gadget of the IT swarm, isolated from the bigger piece of people.
In case we perceive PR populism and almost look at the most powerful blockchain government movement like Smart Dubai, you will find that there's the wrong spot for cryptos. Chase on the Smartdubai.ae page: no cryptos in their blockchain technique. Meanwhile Dubai intends to wind up a blockchain government by 2021. It suggests that they will discard paper and advancement toward getting to be digitalized government. Here blockchain is used as a wellspring of media thought, national prosperity and cutting edge development.
Splendid organization is greater point than simply advanced cash. Convenientce, individual fulfillment, condition, interconnected society and diverse zones lie in the field of interest of Dr Aisha repository Bishr (General Director of Smart Dubai).
Gazprom is another corporate beast enthused about creating developments. Blockchain is an intriguing issue for it's R&D division, since it's not simply one more advancement that could make the Oil&Gas business work more capable, anyway is a play zone for new capacity. Gazprom blockchain-related domains of interest don't cover cryptographic types of cash yet. Another computerized cash couldn't appear inside this business mammoth, in light of the way that the Russian government is controlling Gazprom and the monetary system in country.
Is it a modernized currency age?
The proportion of people who are using cryptographic types of cash in their step by step life is greatly low. Bearings are ending cryptos getting the chance to be standard and it will take us years for cryptos to be grasped wide scale for securing avocados or record understanding.
So we are living in the Tech age that will provoke the Digital money age. This time of gigantic digitalization is seeing packs of tech manifestations show up and obscure away. It's a predictable test&try world model when particular tech (both hardware and writing computer programs) isn't compulsory (remember Windows Vista).
At this moment, associations like SAP and Accenture are managing more blockchain use cases. At last, their point is to make advantage, so blockchain is a wage stream (especially, when it could open already close portals and create leads). The open-source system will strike against corporate mammoths "tweaking" blockchain for their own one of a kind inspirations and making tracks in a contrary heading from "lets discard the banks" viewpoint.