ALready crazy that trading on Stocks (yesterday happened for $GME) can be halted; but that blockchain can be halted says a lot about "decentralisation" here...

A above article published by the news outlet has raising concerns about the accuracy of its reporting. The article appears to be misleading, and it is crucial that the news outlet invests more time in fact-checking its content to ensure the integrity of its reporting.

Firstly, the term "Blockchain security firm" is inaccurate, as these entities primarily focus on smart contract security. Blockchain technology inherently provides security, so it is unnecessary to refer to these firms as "Blockchain security firms." Instead, they should be accurately described as "smart contract security firms.

"Furthermore, the article fails to distinguish between on-chain and off-chain IT developments. Off-chain activities, by their nature, require security measures to ensure their integrity. This distinction is essential to avoid confusion and ensure that readers understand the scope of the security concerns.

Additionally, the article incorrectly describes ZkEVM as a form of Zero-Knowledge (ZK) technology. ZkEVM is a specific implementation of zero-knowledge proofs, but it is not the technology itself. Lastly, the article raises concerns about the involvement of inexperienced individuals in the blockchain space, potentially driving profit-oriented decisions. Consensys, a company known for its involvement in the blockchain industry, has been attempting to undermine the space and paint a picture that Blockchain need security which is non sense.

To maintain the trust of its readers, the news outlet must prioritize fact-checking and accuracy in its reporting. This includes ensuring that technical terms are accurately defined and that the scope of security concerns is clearly understood.